>
> While I am, in fact, too young to remember Sandy Koufax, what it sounds like
> is a sabermetrician. Not in his wildest dreams was Koufax as good as Pedro.
> Don't forget that Koufax pitched in _Dodger Stadium_ off a higher mound.
> Despite those advantages, Pedro is better. His ERA relative to the league
> in 2000 and 1999 was much, much better than anything Koufax ever put
> together. Koufax was good, no mistake, but Pedro was better. It isn't even
> close. By any reasonable measure Pedro is vastly better.
>
See there you go. I want to see Pedro do in a World Series what Kofax did. He was
unhitable as was Gibson. Look at the only stat that counts. Wins in big games. Look at
how he has fared against the Yankees. They have beaten him (or more precisely his
team) whenever it was important. Not by much, but they scratch a run or they wear him
down. Kofax didn't need a run. You got zip off him.
