----- Original Message -----
From: "Trent Shipley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Brin-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 12:28 AM
Subject: Re: Tragedy in Israel


> My memory might be wrong but the Jewish and Arab populations in Israel and
> the territories are of comparable magnitude with the Jewish population
being
> somewhat larger.
>
> The Zionists currently enjoy a kill ratio of better than six to one.
Deaths
> are numbers in scores for Israel, hundreds for Palestinians, and thousands
> for the US.
>
> In statistical or epidimiological terms all the losses are non-trival but
> *very* low on the list of causes of death.  The *insult* to national pride
> and the sense of security is where the rational scholar looks not at the
> epidemiological cost.
>
> Russia in WWII or France in WWI ... now *those* were epidemiologial
disasters.
>
>
> Look, I choose to discount the Zionist claim to some sort of
> incontrivertable, inalienable deed to a patch of dirt in Eurasia as so
much
> myth and absurdly ancient history.
>
> The Zionists had and have a program that required colonizing territory at
the
> expense of a relatively strong and sophisticated indigenous Arab people.
> These sorts of colonial projects have been very successful when the
> colonizers resorted to genocide, ethnic cleansing, ethnocide by forced
> assimilation, or ethnic apartheid.
>
> Israel has a few choices.
>
> First cut the territories lose.  A treaty is nice but not necessary.  This
> will actually *increase* insecurity in Israel.  However, Israel will be
able
> to characterize the acts as illegal inter-state agression.  Currently
> terrorism by the Palestinians is **legitimate** because it is an act of
war
> in a campaign of national liberation against an infinitely stronger
colonial
> and imperial force of occupation.
>
> Let me repeat that: ANY action by Palestinians is justified because they
are
> legitimately in a war of national liberation against absurd odds.
>

So, you are opposed to the Geneva convention?  Were the attacks in '48, '56,
'67, and '73 also justified?  Does Israel have a right to exist?


Dan M.


Reply via email to