I don't know. I have trouble believing that Windows 3,553,221,332,098 would be any more stable than anything we have now. And we have long known that every time someone creates an idiot-proof system, God goes and creates a better idiot. In other words, Galactic digital cognition is probably not infallible.
Hey, an analogy just occurred to me. Jophur = Microsoft executives G'Kek = Open source development community Richard (Who would much rather be using Linux but still can't make his Palm Pilot talk to Red Hat -- Grr) At 01:57 PM 12/18/2001, you wrote: > >I run windows NT. The only that has caused me to get BSOD errors is > >hardware failure, specifically CPU overheating errors. I installed a fan > >and havn't crashed since. > > > >Presumablbly, computer technology 2.8x billion years in advance of our > >own will utilize much better software and more error resistant hardware. Sliante, Richard S. Crawford http://www.mossroot.com AIM: Buffalo2K ICQ: 11646404 Y!: rscrawford MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "It is only with the heart that we see rightly; what is essential is invisible to the eye." --Antoine de Saint Exup�ry "Push the button, Max!"
