The Fool wrote: > >> .. and look at year 500 BC: "Last Record about Earth in the Library". > ^^^^^ > Oops...
> >But is this so-called message that I have never seen directly related to >the uplift universe or to science in general? I do not get from reading >this snippet that this was related to the uplift universe. If it's not >related to the uplift universe then it is irrelevant. > It's *not* related to the uplift universe, however, considering that there *are* ETs in the uplift universe *and* that there are records about Earth dating from *exactly* that time, I think the correlation is obvious. > >This is just theoretical. Perhaps that was so, but 500 million years? >According to the time line ~1/5 of the time since the progenitors? That >is hard to buy. How can you miss something as big as a star for 500 >million years? Surely there was at least _some_ ET's who were in the >milky way during these time periods? > But the Sun was *not* missed. Neither the Earth, probably. What happened was that there were no re-surveys of Earth during these periods. > >Computers never forget. > ??? Have you ever heard about The Blue Screen of Death? :-) >> If you add time-travel to the Uplift Universe, then you open a can >> of worms... > >Don't go knocking time travel. I love time travel. > Me too, but it's a totally different *kind* of story with time-travel and without time-travel. Alberto Monteiro
