Dan Minette wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jeffrey Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Brin-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 12:25 PM > Subject: Re: Egg on my face (was Re: Treatment Of Prisoners) > > > Speaking of which, I wish they'd make up their minds - we're either at > > war and they're POWs or we're not and they're not. > > Are you arguing that the Geneva convention is wrong when it defines who > qualifies as prisoners of war under the convention? That the definition of > those people who wage war but are not protected is mistaken? If so, why? > If not, why do the members of AQ qualify under the criteron I posted (which > was quoted from the Geneva convention.)
Oh ho! No sir, not gonna respond to you, not again! :) -jeffrey "not interested in the briar patch" miller- -- Te audire no possum. Musa sapientum fixa est in aure.
