>I am surprised you are critical of me referring to the CIA World Factbook.
>One would expect that you of all people would be happy to see me get my
>information from an *American* source -- especially given the accusations
>of me being anti-American.
Hey, more power to you.
But, I couldn't help but notice that you deleted the part of the post where
I referred you to the CIA's entry for "West Bank" and "Gaza", which
collectively make up the entity that I refer to as Palestine.
>And since the Palestinians supported the attack, that means that the
>Palestinians attacked Israel four times, instead of
>Egypt/Jordan/Syria/Lebanon? Puh-lease. That makes as much sense as saying
>"The Netherlands supported the US attack on Afghanistan, therefore it is
>not the US but The Netherlands who attacked Afghanistan".
The limits of your ridiculous knows no bounds, Jeroen. No, silly - it
means that Palestine *and* Egypt *and* Syria *and* Lebanon attacked Israel
four times.
So, now that that question is settled, Jeroen, why do you consistently side
with an agressor nation that viciously attacked its neighbour four times
(and there is no other word for attacking Israel on Yom Kippur than
*vicious*), deliberately targets children and civilians, and refuses to so
much as place an offer of PEACE on the table that does not involve the
destruction of its neighbor?
Why?
And finally, just because I am silly enough to believe that someday I will
get an answer:
Jeroen, do you believe that the entity of "Palestine" is exhibiting
goodwill towards Israel?
JDG
__________________________________________________________
John D. Giorgis - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - ICQ #3527685
"Our campaign against international terrorism does not represent some
sort of 'clash of civilizations.' Instead, it is a clash between
civilization and those who would destroy it." -Amb. Richard N. Haass
