> From: Robert Seeberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 
> From: "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> 
> > On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 08:37:22AM -0800, Nick Arnett wrote:
> >
> > > Except sendmail, whose config certainly *can* be edited with a text
> > > editor, but there are only three people in the world who understand
> > > it. ;-)
> >
> > Heh. sendmail is a mess. I abandoned it long ago. Fortunately, there
are
> > good alternatives, qmail and exim to name two.
> >
> > > And then there's kernel configuration and building, which is plenty
> > > confusing.  But that isn't even possible with Windows.
> >
> > It seems overwhelming at first, with so many options. But it really
> > isn't bad at all. Run make xconfig, the defaults are pretty good, so
if
> > you don't know what a given option means just accept the defaults,
and
> > change only the things you know about or want to change. The rest of
it
> > is just a list of a few commands to type for compiling, modules, and
> > boot image.
> >
> This is where your idea of Linux for the masses fails miserably.
> 
> Nobody - wants - to - learn - or - do - commands - anymore.
> 
> If Linux cannot totally eradicate even the possible use of the command
line,
> only geeks will use it. People do not want to learn things, they want
to do
> things.

Which isn't going to happen.

Read this (its long): http://www.cryptonomicon.com/beginning.html

Reply via email to