>From: Matt Grimaldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brin-L)
>Subject: Re: Wiesenthal Ctr Report
>Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 07:47:23 -0700
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > As for how Jereon "should" have answered. Here is a try.
> > "I deplore all acts of intolerance. They have no place in
> > a free society"
> >
>
>Well said.  A good mantra for anyone.
>
>-- Matt
>

I agree with the sentiment as stated.  Acts of intolerance are intolerable.  
Yet it is arrogant to assume that you know "how Jeroen should have 
answered."  I myself strongly disagree with Jeroen on this subject (and I 
applaud Marvin for making my case much more eloquently and intelligently 
than I myself could,) but Jeroen has a right to disagree without us putting 
words in his mouth.

An observation I have made onlist before still stands: It is useless to 
argue with someone that refuses to ever accept that their position may be 
inaccurate or wrong when presented with evidence of such.  Bashing at them 
is futile if no goal is being realized. What purpose do such attacks serve?

I think perhaps some of us (myself included) need to recognize that this is 
a polarized topic that has no clear 'winner' and never will. In arguing it, 
our list constantly divides itself along certain lines that don't ever 
change.  No one ever changes their minds.  So why discuss it further?

Jon

_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com

Reply via email to