----- Original Message -----
From: "J. van Baardwijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Brin-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 8:29 AM
Subject: RE: Scouted: Commentary: Why Europe Sides Against the Jews /
time.com


> At 08:55 24-4-02 -0400, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
>
> >None of them made any effort to save their Jews.  The people of Western
> >Europe could have fought to protect their Jews - and themselves too, of
> >course.  Even under occupation they could have tried.  But they didn't.
>
> He who is without sin...
>
> How hard did the American population try to help the Native Americans when
> their fellow Americans tried their best to massacre the Native Americans?
> How many of them hid NA's in their homes and fought against their
countrymen?
>
> How hard did the American population try to help the blacks when they were
> enslaved? How many of them hid blacks in their homes and fought against
> their countrymen?
>
> How hard did the American population try to help their Japanese citizens
> when the US government locked them up in camps? How many of them hid
> Japanese in their homes and raided those camps to free their Japanese
> fellow citizens?
>
> How hard did the American population try to help their blacks when racism
> reared its ugly head? How many of them protected the blacks and fought
> against the racists?
>
> How hard did the American population try to join the fight against
> terrorism after planes crashed into the WTC and the Pentagon last year?
>
>  From all I have seen and heard, not all that many in every single one of
> those cases.
>
Thing is Jeroen, none of those things is likely to ever be repeated in the
US, while the trend in Europe points to a repetition of an even greater evil
that happened within living memory.
Even you must be capable of seeing that.

All you have done with this silly tirade is lend fuel to the "Jeroens
paranoid fantasy world" argument.
To attack rather than respond directly to the argument in progress is a sign
of either a sore loser or a sociopath. I'm sure you can guess which your
detractors will choose to go with. Point being that that isnt a very smart
path to follow.


>
> First they went after the Native Americans,
> but I did nothing because I was not a Native American.
>
There were people who championed the native Americans.

> Then they enslaved the blacks,
> but I did nothing because I was not black.

And there were those who worked to free the slaves.

>
> Then they went after our Japanese citizens,
> but I did nothing because I was not Japanese.

Reperations were paid, I believe. Where are the Arab detention camps in the
US?

>
> Then they went after the blacks again,
> but I did nothing because I was not black.

Who went after the African-Americans again?
I can guesss what you are getting at here, but its pretty silly crap.

>
> Then the terrorists attacked us in their own country,
> but rather than go out and fight, I hid in my basement
> because I was too chicken too fight.

The grammer in this one is so messed up I cannot guess what you are trying
to say.
No speaky de english?

>
> Then finally they came after me,
> but by then there was nobody left who cared.
>
Well, you could always build that "Jeroens Wallow Of Self Pity" webpage you
keep threatening people with.
I'm sure that would make a lot of people care.


xponent
Whiner Response Team Maru
rob

Reply via email to