Jon Gabriel wrote:
> >From: Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Also
> >interesting points are what factors would contribute toward moderation, is
> >it
> >desirable or is a site of shame a good idea at all, what could be put on
> >such a
> >site and what makes such a site better/worse. I think it is a valid
> >discussion
> >as is any on this list. (Although I personally would much rather like to go
> >back
> >to the 'ding' system)
>
> I think a 'ding' system would be more effective, and more appropriate,
> personally. It has become increasingly obvious to me over the past 6-12
> months that some list members (myself included at times) are incapable of
> objectively and unemotionally dicussing certain topics. I think if more
> people spoke out to ding (while not singling out one offender,) we'd find
> fewer personal attacks.
The ding system is great. But nobody has been dinging lately when dings
have been called for.
Jo Anne hasn't been as active as she once was. Marvin's attempt to take
up the Wand of Dinging awhile back didn't entirely work. I wouldn't be
comfortable wielding a Wand of Dinging all the time.
Who's going to ding?
Julia
