On Thu, 9 May 2002, J. van Baardwijk wrote: > At 12:06 09-05-2002 -0700, Adam Lipscomb wrote: > > >Your refusal to drop the "Wall of Shame" indicates to me that youu're not > >really buying into the concept of IAAMOAC, and are instead relying on > >heavy-handed bullying to get your way. > > Actually, I *have* offered to drop it. All I asked was that some of the key > players (John, Gautam and Tom) would support the proposal of a blanket > apology and general pardon. > > But apparently, that was too much to ask... :-( > > (Although I still see no reason *why* that would be too much to ask.)
Lemme get this straight. Have we reached a point where one side says, "If you do A I'll drop B," while the other side says, "If you drop B I'll do A," and now we're fighting over who goes first? Despite the fact that A is a good idea with no logical connection to B, and despite the fact that B is a bad idea with no logical connection to A? Weird. Marvin Long Austin, Texas "Never flay a live Episiarch." -- Galactic Proverbs 7563:34(j)
