On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 05:43:24PM -0600, Michael Harney wrote: > By allowing sexual material on this list, you deny an underage person > with prudish parents the right to join this list simply so perverts on > list can publically exchange stroking material.
Your logic continues to be seriously flawed. ALLOWING does not DENY. They are basically opposites. Parents are certainly able to monitor what their children do on the Internet and/or tell them what they may or may not read. Your statement is ludicrous. > Wrong, my argument is: I judge that a portion or (Y)'s rights has > less value than the whole of (Z)'s rights. Therefore, is it ok to > take a protion of (Y)'s rights away if that portion of (Y)'s rights > takes away all of (Z)'s rights. Again, your logic is flawed. You are taking aways (Y)'s RIGHTS for (Z)'s CONVENIENCE. This is a simple concept. RIGHTS do not equal CONVENIENCE. .... major rationalizations deleted .... -- "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.com/
