----- Original Message ----- From: "Baardwijk, J. van DTO/SLWPD/RZO/BOZO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 5:13 AM Subject: RE: James Mark Constantino
> > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > Van: Robert Seeberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Verzonden: dinsdag 28 mei 2002 3:19 > > Aan: Brin-Hell > > Onderwerp: James Mark Constantino > > > Note: If the previous note is true, then we would be neglegent in our > > duty to behave in a civilised manner if we excluded someone simply > > for being mentally ill. I can think of a certain former listmember who > > was a sufferer, and she was treated with great kindness for the most > > part, even when she was a bit offensive. > > However, she did not engage in trolling (and certainly not to the extent > that Mark is trolling), did not post sexually explicit posts or promote > killing people. > > > > Note: Mark has been a member on this list for quite a bit longer than I > > have been here, and was always fairly well behaved. I propose that we > > owe it to his long time good standing to give him or any longtime > > member a very long time to change his behavior to something less > > eccentric or somehow agreeable (less frequently complained about) to > > the rest of the membership. > > How long should that "long time to change his behaviour" be? Mark has been > trolling for some six weeks already, sending well over 300 messages. Despite > repeated requests to stop (by several people, and both on-list and > off-list), he continues to troll. > When Mark was first accused of trolling, I took that as rhetoric not as a definition of his behavior. Marks cooperation with being defined does not prevent what we have seen from being something different. xponent Ravings Maru rob
