> From: Ronn Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > At 07:18 PM 6/29/02, Mark wrote: > >The Germans were correct in using gas, but chose an inappropriate gas. > >Expensive, painful, allows the walls to be desecrated by the rodents. > > > >I think merely CO en masse would work just fine, be relatively painless, and > >quick. I guess the real tough part would be disposal of the remains. > > > >How about a big mulch pile? I guess that leaves a lot of bones, but the pigs > >could use ground bone meal. Or something. > > > >I suggest at least 1% of the world's population. > > Most environmental extremists think the current figure should be something > more like 92%+ (i.e., the maximum the Earth can sustain according to them > is no more than 500 million).
The problem is you can fit every single person in the world (~6,000,000,000) in approximately half the state of Texas. Giving each the space of about 30ft x 30ft. Before you realize that people live in families, marriages / children etcetera which reduces the Total area drastically. Before you also realize the people can live above one another in apartments and high-rise skyscrapers. Those environmental extremists are FULL OF SHIT. > > > >Can I get an ETA on when > >these disposal facilities could be built. > > > >I'm dead serious. > > Good choice of words. > > >I want to be the ribbon-cutter at the ceremony. > > As I always ask when debating someone who seems to think the environmental > extremists are correct, "Are you volunteering?" > > --Ronn! :) > > "Since I was a small boy, two states have been added to our country and two > words have been added to the pledge of Allegiance... UNDER GOD. Wouldn't > it be a pity if someone said that is a prayer and that would be eliminated > from schools too?" > -- Red Skelton Good riddance.
