At 10:34 AM 6/30/02, "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Ronn Blankenship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 9:40 AM
>Subject: Re: Efficiency in Genocide
>
>
> >
> > I think the point is that there is no need to move everyone on Earth into
> > one building in Texas, nor is there a need to euthanize 92%+ of
> > humanity. There are some places where people are too crowded or lack
> > resources, but there are other places that could absorb more people.
> >
>Agreed!
>But it is an interesting thought problem.
>If it were a necessary eventuality, how would we do it?
Which? Move everyone to Texas, or kill > 5.5e9 humans, preferably without
rendering the remains unusable as fertilizer for the crops of the surviving
elite?
--Ronn! :)
"Since I was a small boy, two states have been added to our country and two
words have been added to the pledge of Allegiance... UNDER GOD. Wouldn't
it be a pity if someone said that is a prayer and that would be eliminated
from schools too?"
-- Red Skelton
