----- Original Message ----- From: "Ronn Blankenship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 11:06 AM Subject: Re: Efficiency in Genocide
> At 10:34 AM 6/30/02, "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Ronn Blankenship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2002 9:40 AM > >Subject: Re: Efficiency in Genocide > > > > > > > > > > I think the point is that there is no need to move everyone on Earth into > > > one building in Texas, nor is there a need to euthanize 92%+ of > > > humanity. There are some places where people are too crowded or lack > > > resources, but there are other places that could absorb more people. > > > > >Agreed! > >But it is an interesting thought problem. > >If it were a necessary eventuality, how would we do it? > > > > Which? Move everyone to Texas, or kill > 5.5e9 humans, preferably without > rendering the remains unusable as fertilizer for the crops of the surviving > elite? > Moving everyone to Texas of course! I havent seen any discussion on how to murder large numbers of people quickly and efficiently, or is *that* conversation limited to Xponent-L? xponent Searching Yahoo Maru rob
