----- Original Message -----
From: "J. van Baardwijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: Question for everyone


> At 16:19 23-10-2002 -0700, Matt Grimaldi wrote:
>
> >The way it was phrased left that impression in my mind, and suggested a
> >series of thoughts which were, oh, let's say unflattering, that the rest
> >of the list should feel guilty for not doing exactly what you thought
> >they should, and so on, it gets worse from there.
> >
> >What positive thing were you trying to accomplish by saying that?
> >I certainly can't think of any.
>
> The initial accomplishment would be people pointing out to John Giorgis
> that his behaviour, oh, let's put it nicely, leaves something to be
desired?
>
> The eventual accomplishment would be John Giorgis cleaning up his act and
> starting to behave like a civilised adult.
>

Whatever it was that John did (long forgotten by almost everyone by now) it
certainly didnt call for the endless fits spits and pity parties the list is
subjected to.......by you.

Your childish and churlish behavior is far worse than anything you have
accused John of.

After about 2 years of this you should have some clue as to how unreasonable
your bitching is and how completely unrealistic your expectations are.

I am interested in hearing diverse opinions, even those that I find
antagonistic to my worldview, so I can appreciate what you bring to
political discussions. But when you go off on John  with such zeal, with
unasked for frequency, and unfortunate poor judgement, it makes it hard to
take you very seriously during other discussions.
You cause your views to be discounted.

As far as I am concerned you can hate anyone you want as long as I dont have
to hear about it very often.

xponent
Sigh Maru
rob


_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to