> From: Alberto Monteiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The Fool quoted: > > > > 16 Jacob became father to Joseph the husband of Mary, > > of whom Jesus was born, who is called Christ. > > > I imagine that the fact that Mary was mentioned in > this sentence might be interpreted as Jacob being > _her_ father and not Joseph. You know, translation > errors from Aramaic to Greek, etc.
You can delude yourself all you want, but it says 'father to Joseph'. > [and it seems very unlikely that they would _err_ > at this point, just three generations before > the books were written - not to mention that > it would be simpler to create faked genealogies > and stick to them if all that was fiction] A. This isn't even the biggest contradiction. Just wait. I will write about a few of the more interesting ones. B. The gospels weren't written as one history they were written as stories by different people, and later people put them together, rewrote them. First came mark, which was already a gestalt. Then luke which used mark as a starting point, and then matthew. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
