--- Jon Gabriel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >How many non-Jews were sent to concentration camps
> for helping the Jews?
> >How many were put to death?  If I read Gautam
> right, many people did fight
> >the Holocaust with relatively minimal risk.
> 
> If that's what Gautam is saying, then I think I'll
> probably disagree.  6 
> million Jews and 12 million non-Jews died.  I will
> hunt for online 
> statistics on how many of those non-Jews were killed
> for helping Jews and 
> let you know what I find.
> 
> Jon

I wouldn't go so far as to say _minimal_ risk.  What I
was saying was that there was minimal risk to
declining to actively participate in the Holocaust. 
That's the truly shocking thing.  Even in Nazi
Germany, if you wanted out of the mass execution
squads, (einsatzgruppen, I think, but I bet Damon will
correct me) all you had to do was ask.  It's just that
people didn't.  I was further arguing that in Vichy
France (for example) there wasn't much risk to helping
people escape because the Germans _weren't there_. 
There were a few officers, certainly, but the
occupation of Southern France didn't occur until after
Operation Torch.  But risk or no risk, I'm probably
holding people to a more exacting standard than Dan
is.  I believe that it is better to be dead than to
consent to some things, even if consenting is no more
than _passively_ consenting and failing to actively
resist.  When the Danes succeeded in doing what they
did it's not as if the Germans put all of Denmark to
the sword - by the standards of what they did to the
rest of Europe, they didn't do much at all.  My
argument is that - given the multiple successful
examples of resistance - more should have been done. 
Dan seems to think that I think it was because of
cowardice.  There may have been some of that.  I think
the major reason was that it was Jews who bore the
brunt of it, and they didn't really care.  Had it been
Catholics (for example) I think things might have been
different.

But we have a relative scale here, in terms of most
effective to least effective resistance:
Serbs and Russians (militarily)
Danes (saving their Jews)
and, at the bottom,
France (which did neither).  Given that some people
did manage to do it, what's your explanation for why
others, in basically the same circumstances, failed?

Gautam

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
http://platinum.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to