> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Gautam Mukunda
... > Only to the extent that the possession of _any_ WMDs > by Iraq immediately makes the war fully legal under > international law. Any at all. What does that have to do with whether or not some of the administration's justifications were deceptive, irresponsible, or exaggerated? > Except that no one has even approached proving either > case. So what, other than pure partisanship, is this > about? For me, it's about whether or not the administration was being completely honest when it was arguing for the war. Honesty in the White House is important, wouldn't you say? And especially so in matters of sovereignty, life and death? You seem to have said that no one could honestly question that, but honestly, I do. I know how intelligence briefings are supposed to be prepared and reviewed before POTUS and his staff see them, and the administration's explanations are at odds with it. Nick _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
