On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 03:01:20PM -0700, Deborah Harrell wrote: > Hey! What about the astronomy example I gave in my first post this > thread: > > "And for an even longer timeframe from observance to 'scientific > revision,' look at the change from an Earth-centered to a sun-centered > system! :) "
Not a good comparison. If we looked at the sun and planets but never realized they were moving at all, then maybe you would have a point. The problem is that you are comparing a situation where we have a lot of measurements and interaction with the element of interest and have found NOTHING to support your claim, with various things that were based on interpretation of data that did exist and just required further refinement. NOTHING does not equal SOMETHING. -- "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.net/ _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
