On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 12:17:24PM -0500, Dan Minette wrote: > You mean did I miss the fact that you were playing the "look at me, > I'm so clever, I'm mocking someone with their own words" game?
What happened to I'll be happy to assume good intentions? > No, I just considered that of secondary importance. Right, it is more important to play the passive agressive game and say how evil I am and how clever you are to recognize it. > Well, I thought you were replying to my post. Silly me. I was replying to your comment about Jan, which I quoted. I didn't say anything about your excessive generalizations. > You posts are often a good example of aggressive. I didn't realize this was in dispute? > OK, since you like blunt, I'll be just a bit blunt. I never cease > to be amazed by the arrogance of ignorance. You don't know what > happened, and your speculation is worse than useless. The only point > I can see is trying to get people to act out of anger. As I predicted you would respond. Interesting that you accuse me of not understanding your situation, but you assume you understand mine. > Further, before you use a term, like passive aggressive, it would be > helpful to learn its meaning. If you wish, I'd be more than happy to > explain it to you. If you don't want to know, that's your business. Talk about arrogance! -- "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.net/ _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
