> Option D doesn't even come close to explaining why > Bush has described the > war as winnable just about every other day since > 9/11.
Why on earth would he do anything other than describe the war as "winnable?" How many votes do you think he would get if every time he talked about the subject he described the war as "an effort to create less incentive for terrorism to exist." Most people on the list understand that the war on terror is the latter. Many people across the US won't, can't, or are to lazy to intellectualize it, so the former sounds like he's "getting the job done." IOW, Bush's message has to appeal to the broadest and dumbest of voting Americans. Bush is like every other politician: he does political double-talk. To do otherwise would confuse eligible voters that aren't equipped to intellectualize what he says, or not interested enough beyond the TV news soundbyte. Damon. ===== ------------------------------------------------------------ Damon Agretto [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum." http://www.geocities.com/garrand.geo/index.html Now Building: Legends Aussie Centurion Mk.5/1 ------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Shop for Back-to-School deals on Yahoo! Shopping. http://shopping.yahoo.com/backtoschool _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
