--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > How do you know? Just because his name is "Sam" > doesn't make him lovable or > fair. It happened in his stores. More than one. > Maybe it is company policy. It > is up to those who would like to excuse the > behavior to reveal ways that the > corporate structure responded to knowledge of the > behavior. And why should > it take government policing polices to undcover and > correct discriminatory > actions. Don't conservatives believe in less > government interference in business > practices? Don't conservatives believe that (a) the > market will take care of > these sorts of things (not if the practices > dramatically increase corporate > practices) or b) that companies willl act > responsibly on their own?
No. That would be stupid. It would be as contrary to the facts as believing in clutch hitting, in fact. The government has a role in society. I don't think it should be running my life or surrendering to my country's enemies, which makes me a conservative in today's context, sadly enough. But policing labor laws? No, that's a good idea. You know, I get accused of setting up straw men a fair amount and, as usual, you do it far more and I _know_ that no one will say a word. Enough of this nonsense. ===== Gautam Mukunda [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Freedom is not free" http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
