> From: Dan Minette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> From: "Doug Pensinger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> > Dan wrote:
> >
> > > Second, he misses the sociology of science completely.  If he
were to
> > > make the more limited claim that states that "there increased
number of
> > > anomalies that have to be explained in an ad hoc manner indicates
that
> > > there may be serious limitations to our present theory", then
he'd have
> a
> > > very strong case.
> >
> > OK, I know I'm way out of my league when discussing this stuff with
you,
> > but if the above is true, why spend any time at all trying the
patch the
> > theory up with fantastic ideas like inflation and dark matter?
> 
> Or Planck's constant, or the Bohr theory of the atom?  Inflation is
> certainly not an elegant theory....but it is at least a decent
> phenomenological model of the very very early universe.  It is a way
of
> expressing the parameters.
> 
> Dark matter is used to explain the rotation of the galaxies.  If one
does
> General Relativity (which I think can be well approximated by good
old
> Newtonian gravitation for the cases we are considering), we find that
the
> rotation of the stars in the galaxies do not match the mass of the
observed
> stars.  If there were dark matter, then the rotation would be
consistent
> with what we know about gravity.  If not, then we have to find a
fudge for
> gravity....one we have no real basis for.  Of the two, dark matter
was
> considered a bit more conservative.

<<http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/0507619>>

General Relativity Resolves Galactic Rotation Without Exotic Dark
Matter 

Abstract:

A galaxy is modeled as a stationary axially symmetric pressure-free
fluid in general relativity. For the weak gravitational fields under
consideration, the field equations and the equations of motion
ultimately lead to one linear and one nonlinear equation relating the
angular velocity to the fluid density. It is shown that the rotation
curves for the Milky Way, NGC 3031, NGC 3198 and NGC 7331 are
consistent with the mass density distributions of the visible matter
concentrated in flattened disks. Thus the need for a massive halo of
exotic dark matter is removed. For these galaxies we determine the mass
density for the luminous threshold as 10^{-21.75} kg.m$^{-3}. 
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to