At 12:59 PM Monday 9/4/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

In a message dated 9/3/2006 5:47:11 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

This  type of change, while certainly having negative consequences, is not  a
catastrophe.  I'd argue that the potential for disaster from an  asteroid hit
is far higher than from global  warming.



Global warming will alter weather conditions around the world. It would
probably l upset food production and cause other sorts of economic havoc. The political consequences of this cannot be determined but it is likely that they
will be bad for those currently at the top (us). An asteroid hit will be far
more devastating but there is no indication that one is imminent.


We should know in about 23 years.


-- Ronn!  :)



_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to