On 1/31/2007 8:54:36 PM, Charlie Bell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On 01/02/2007, at 1:20 PM, Robert G. Seeberger wrote: > > > > > > "This cycle happens an infinite number of times, thus eliminating > any > > start or end of time," > Frampton said. "There is no Big Bang." > > Um... I thought Big Bang theory > doesn't rule out a prior Big Crunch. > What they're doing is presenting a > new model for collapse at the end > of this universe, not changing the start point, as far as I > understand it. Now, where's a physicist when we need one... >
Yeah! Where am them? <G> What I wonder is if the secondary cycles repeat the conditions of the parent cycle. (As if they are seeds) IOW, will the daughter universes be as favorable for life as ours, or will they be random iterations? xponent Always With the Questions Maru rob xponent _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
