At 01:40 PM Sunday 8/31/2008, William T Goodall wrote:

>On 31 Aug 2008, at 19:13, Kevin B. O'Brien wrote:
>
> > Dan M wrote:
> >> I wouldn't put it that way, because there are a wealth of possible
> >> future
> >> tests.  And theories that have been falsified are still taught in
> >> science
> >> class...in fact most physics that is being taught has been
> >> falsified....but
> >> survives as special cases of the new theory.
> >>
> > But in that case we don't present it as true, exactly. For example,
> > Newton's Laws of Motion are now presented as acceptable
> > approximations.
> > Nothing wrong with that, it is easier to do the calculations that way
> > than to use General Relativity to calculate orbits, for instance.
> >>
>
>I was taught that 22/7 was a handy approximation for pi but I wasn't
>taught that it was pi. And I was taught the Bohr model of the atom in
>high school chemistry along with the explanation that it was a
>perfectly good model for high-school chemistry although superseded.
>
> > In a class that is about how science develops, that could well make
> > sense. I taught a class some years ago on History of Science, and that
> > is something I tried to bring into it. But I would (and did) insist
> > that
> > we look at this process in terms of how science makes these judgments,
> > and that is by making falsifiable hypotheses and testable predictions,
> > and then doing the test. If we don't do that, I don't think we are
> > doing
> > science.
>
>If schools are to teach history of science as well as science then
>some other less useful subject has to be cancelled. I vote for PE/
>Gym :-)



Already been done in some systems to provide more academic class 
time.  Other folks point to the increasing frequency of obesity among 
even grade-school children and the fact that between video games and 
gang shootings kids don't have a chance to play outside, and studies 
that show that school-age children have a hard time maintaining 
concentration through several hours of "book learnin'" without having 
it broken up by periods of physical activity.


. . . ronn!  :)



_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to