On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 6:16 AM, Olin Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> >For one thing, politicians will tend to choose science advisers who tell
> them
> >what they want to hear, *especially* if the advisers are organized into a
> >body that has any sort of transparency.
>
> What if the members of the council were somehow chosen by the professional
> associations of various disciplines?  If they were nominated by their
> scientific pears and elected by practicing scientists?


Much better.  Some sort of science-based vetting process would make all the
difference.

Nick
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to