On Dec 7, 2013, at 3:37 PM, Tom Browder wrote: > Oops, blind again--that should be color_fix whose sig is: > > void color_fix(const struct bu_structparse *, const char *, char *, > const char *)
That makes more sense and fits conversion to the proposed. > Note that in my sig list I removed 'register' which is used in several > sigs. I don't think its presence or absence affects a func signature > but I may be wrong. Is it okay to remove such? Yes, they're okay to remove them there. Alas, they shouldn't be removed everywhere throughout the code as testing even recently did demonstrate a measurable performance drop. Apparently, we do have them in some useful/critical places where the hints help the compiler. Cheers! Sean ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base. Download it for free now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ BRL-CAD Developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-devel
