Sowmini.Varadhan at Sun.COM wrote: > On (01/23/09 11:28), Dave Miner wrote: >> Some belated comments: >> >> - Should discuss what happens to libinetcfg, which this would appear to >> supercede > > good point. The libinetcfg interfaces were Consolidation Private. > libipadm will merge those interfaces in, and the eventual goal > (after sufficient implementation experience has been obtained) is > to make the libipadm interfaces Public. > >> - It's not stated explicitly whether ipadm is intended to provide both >> human and machine-parseable output formats. I infer from section 5 that >> it is, but seems a topic for section 1 and for things like show-address, >> which needs filtering options. > > yes, the -p option will be supported. But I'm not sure what you have > in mind, when you speak of the need for filtering options- could > you please clarify? >
At a minimum, the protocol selection, which is -P in other subcommands. Probably the lnum as well. I'd think about providing a way to show by address, rather than just interface name, too. Perhaps others. Dave
