> > - I'm skeptical of the need to provide non-persistent object  
 > > manipulation.  My assertion is that much of the system administration  
 > > model these days is implicitly persistent, and the overall system  
 > > usability would benefit from this being the default (if not only) mode  
 > > used by networking as well.
 > 
 > I personally agree with you, but the design also does not prohibit
 > the addtion of non-persistent versions down the road, should we
 > find an actual need for these.

I'm confused; how could libipadm be used by ifconfig without
non-persistent support?  The ipadm utility should be very simple and
should care very little about persistence -- all that logic should be
in libipadm.

-- 
meem

Reply via email to