> Tutor and Analysis, places their results in the same list. Only one
> result per move is allowed.
True. But it seems to me that the "tutor analysis" is saved during the
match
and, at the end of the match, if you analyze it again, if the tutor level
equals the analysis level (e.g both world class), then the analysis is
much
faster since it is already done.
In fact, putting gnubg player 0 at the same level as evaluation and
analysis
and tutor (e.g. world class) used to make the post-match analysis
extremely
fast, since most of the job is already done. But it's no longer the case.
> > I think it has already been reported and, if I'm not wrong, an easy
> > solution would be to sort the moves by cubeful equity and then by
> > cubeless equity: when all of them have cubeful equity +1.000 (or
-1.000),
> > this should prevent odd-looking moves. Not a big deal however, the
> > match is already won/lost ...
>
> No that won't help. If all moves corresponds to
> "game(gammon/backgammon) won/lost" they cannot be sorted by
> evaluation, but need some "human" quality added to them. For example
> maximum number of cross-overs.
You're right. The cubeless trick was ok only for cases where after the
current move there's a double pass (all cubeful equities = -1.000).
MaX.
_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
