On 09/04/09 4:00 PM, "Michael Petch" <[email protected]> wrote: > An interesting thing can be said about this. The way to remove the entire > problem and simplify things could also be done by not allowing a drag to a > destination that can't be done in one roll - Period. Maybe one exception - Doubles. _______________________________________________ Bug-gnubg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Handling ambiguous checker mov... Zulli, Louis P
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Handling ambiguous checker moves Zulli, Louis P
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Handling ambiguous checker moves Michael Petch
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Handling ambiguous checker moves Zulli, Louis P
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Handling ambiguous checker moves Michael Petch
- Fwd: [Bug-gnubg] Handling ambiguous checker moves Zulli, Louis P
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Handling ambiguous checker moves Michael Petch
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Handling ambiguous checker moves Michael Petch
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Handling ambiguous checker moves Philippe Michel
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Handling ambiguous checker mov... Michael Petch
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Handling ambiguous checker... Michael Petch
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Handling ambiguous checker... Ian Shaw
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Handling ambiguous checker moves efearkayin
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Handling ambiguous checker moves Massimiliano Maini
