Follow-up Comment #9, bug #67939 (group groff):

[comment #8 comment #8:]
> in theory, `length` might be broken enough that we'll
> _have_ to replace it.  Hmm, I can't find the ticket for this.

Bug #67231 started off reporting a defect in .length that ended up getting
demoted to a documentation change.  Its initial comment referenced "a separate
but closely related problem with `length`, which I will file as a separate
ticket," but this teaser was never followed up on in this ticket, and no later
tickets seem obvious candidates (though it's hard to tell because the
statement is so vague about what the related problem is).  So this promised
.length ticket may never have been filed.


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?67939>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to