On 12/21/09 1:17 PM, "Neil Puttock" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2009/12/21 Carl Sorensen <[email protected]>:
>
>> For me, on OSX 10.5, barline-test1 has ultra-thick barlines, but
>> barline-test2 has good barlines.
>
> Interesting. :) Are you using the default viewer?
Yes, this was under Preview.
I also looked under Adobe Reader 8, and at high magnification, file 2 has
thicker barlines than file 1. At 100%, 2 looks better than 1, but both look
pretty bad due to low resolution on the monitor and no dithering -- stems
have variable thicknesses, etc.
HTH,
Carl
>
> The first file is LilyPond's default output, whereas the second has
> blotted barlines switched on. Blotted barlines used to be the default
> for both BarLine and SpanBar (you can check this by comparing `Sängers
> Morgenlied' from the 2.4 and 2.6 docs), but this behaviour was changed
> due to reports of bad rendering in acroread.
>
> Cheers,
> Neil
_______________________________________________
bug-lilypond mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
