jao <j...@gnu.org> writes:

> We release less frequently than Emacs, so i am guessing users (all three
> of them!) will be fine either way.

OK, sounds good to me.

> Yes, that's no problem.  I am not the original author of the mode, so
> back in the day I didn't pay attention, but my elisp skills have
> improved enough in the intervening 20 years and i'm happy to take care
> of it now :)

Thanks!  Should you want to make it more official, feel free to send a
patch to update the "Maintainer" field with your name and email address.

BTW, we are trying to push to convert code to use the new lexical scope.
If you find some time, it would be great if you could test the attached
patch that enables it for mixal-mode.el.  (It would be hard for me to
verify that it works since I don't use GNU MDK myself.)
From 2f77be1207eedcbb7008db4f8d513bf25a4ad7db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefan Kangas <ste...@marxist.se>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 15:52:01 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] * lisp/progmodes/mixal-mode.el: Use lexical-binding.

 lisp/progmodes/mixal-mode.el | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lisp/progmodes/mixal-mode.el b/lisp/progmodes/mixal-mode.el
index 468c116b67..6691074ac8 100644
--- a/lisp/progmodes/mixal-mode.el
+++ b/lisp/progmodes/mixal-mode.el
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-;;; mixal-mode.el --- Major mode for the mix asm language.
+;;; mixal-mode.el --- Major mode for the mix asm language.  -*- lexical-binding:t -*-
 ;; Copyright (C) 2003-2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

Reply via email to