On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 07:17:02AM -0400, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > CC0 is not a "copyright" license, so the text "Copyright (c)" makes > little sense since the goal is to put the work into the Public Domain > -- i.e. no copyright applied.
Strictly speaking, the Public Domain consists of works that are old enough or made by the US or so; CC0 emulates it using copyright as the means. > As to what Creative Commons and FSF recommend for non-GNU projects is > kinda not relevant to what GNU projects are recommended to do by the > FSF. So should GNU maintainers add copyright lines to CC0d files? what about non-gnu Savannah programs? which recommendation applies to them? what should the hosting requirement be (we routinely point to GNU Maintainer Info to tell how software should be packaged)?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
