Vansh Dobhal commented: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/issues/5440#note_143286 > Hi @michallenc @ppisa @gedare, > > I’ve started ramping up on the SJA1000 driver and reviewing the recent > implementation, particularly the worker path and TX handling logic. I’m > currently setting up my environment to reproduce the `rtems_can_test` > scenarios under QEMU (pc386) to better understand the end-to-end behavior. > > As an initial direction for my GSoC preparation, I’m considering focusing on: > > * establishing a clean QEMU + pc386 baseline for the SJA1000 path, > * studying the TX scheduling/abort behavior under load, > * and identifying areas where example/test coverage could be strengthened for > more reliable automated testing. > > Before I go too far down this path — would you recommend continuing with > SJA1000-focused experimentation and test improvements first, or should > contributors prioritize work in the `can_queue` layer earlier? > > I’ll share concrete results once I have the QEMU setup running. > > Thanks! -- View it on GitLab: https://gitlab.rtems.org/rtems/rtos/rtems/-/issues/5440#note_143286 You're receiving this email because of your account on gitlab.rtems.org.
_______________________________________________ bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/bugs
