This would also explain why I'm not finding any there, either. :-) Ted Neward Java, .NET, XML Services Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing http://www.tedneward.com
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 10:15 AM > To: Ted Neward > Cc: build-dev@openjdk.java.net > Subject: Re: FW: ATL headers and libraries? > > > Tim's email: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2007- > December/000654.html > > Mentions this: > hotspot\src\os\windows\vm\jvm_windows.h(33) : fatal error C1083: > Cannot open include file: 'windows.h': No such file > or directory > > > But windows.h should not be a problem to find, right? Platform SDK > should > have one I assume. > > I seriously doubt that Hotspot would have any dependence on atlmfc. > I searched and found no include's of any obvious atl files. > > -kto > > > Ted Neward wrote: > > My understanding was that it did--there are a few build-dev emails > about > > missing "atlmfc.h" just a few weeks ago.... > > > > But I haven't verified that from looking at the sources yet--been > busy with > > other things. I'll take a look and see. Can you check with the > Hotspot team > > if they know of any in the meantime (or, perhaps better yet, can you > suggest > > which list would be best to forward this email to)? > > > > Ted Neward > > Java, .NET, XML Services > > Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing > > http://www.tedneward.com > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 11:24 AM > >> To: Ted Neward > >> Cc: build-dev@openjdk.java.net > >> Subject: Re: FW: ATL headers and libraries? > >> > >> Does the hotspot sources have a ATL/MFC dependence? > >> > >> -kto > >> > >> > >> Ted Neward wrote: > >>> Kelly, et al— > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Should we just wait with the attempted port until this (see below) > >>> happens? Or do we want to try and actively remove the dependencies > on > >>> ATL/MFC from the Hotspot code? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Ted Neward > >>> > >>> Java, .NET, XML Services > >>> > >>> Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing > >>> > >>> http://www.tedneward.com > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> *From:* Herb Sutter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 13, 2008 4:08 AM > >>> *To:* Ted Neward > >>> *Subject:* RE: ATL headers and libraries? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Unfortunately, no, there is no way to get to ATL and/or MFC without > >>> buying VS Std/Pro/etc. (of course, you can get those through your > >> MSDN > >>> subscription, etc.) > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> For the future, though, the plan is to ship both ATL and MFC (x86, > I > >>> believe) in VC++ Express at some point. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Herb > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> *From:* Ted Neward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> *Sent:* Monday, May 12, 2008 12:23 PM > >>> *To:* Herb Sutter > >>> *Subject:* ATL headers and libraries? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Can you tell me (or put me in touch with somebody who can) if it’s > >>> possible to get a hold of the ATL and/or MFC headers and libraries > >>> without buying Visual Studio Standard/Professional/Enterprise/etc? > I > >>> have a client who’s looking to see if they can use just VC++ > Express > >> to > >>> maintain some code that uses ATL and MFC. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Ted Neward > >>> > >>> Java, .NET, XML Services > >>> > >>> Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing > >>> > >>> http://www.tedneward.com > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> No virus found in this outgoing message. > >>> Checked by AVG. > >>> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.15/1426 - Release Date: > >>> 5/10/2008 11:12 AM > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> No virus found in this incoming message. > >>> Checked by AVG. > >>> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.15/1426 - Release Date: > >>> 5/10/2008 11:12 AM > >>> > >>> > >>> No virus found in this outgoing message. > >>> Checked by AVG. > >>> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1430 - Release Date: > >>> 5/13/2008 7:31 AM > >>> > >> No virus found in this incoming message. > >> Checked by AVG. > >> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1430 - Release Date: > >> 5/13/2008 7:31 AM > >> > > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > > Checked by AVG. > > Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1434 - Release Date: > 5/15/2008 > > 7:24 AM > > > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG. > Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1434 - Release Date: > 5/15/2008 7:24 AM > No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.16/1448 - Release Date: 5/16/2008 7:42 PM
