Hi Kim,

> On 26 Mar 2018, at 18:34, Kim Barrett <kim.barr...@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Mar 26, 2018, at 11:01 AM, Robin Westberg <robin.westb...@oracle.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Please review this small change that defines the NOMINMAX macro when 
>> building HotSpot on Windows.
>> 
>> Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199619
>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rwestberg/8199619/webrev.00/ 
>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rwestberg/8199619/webrev.00/>
>> Testing: building with/without precompiled headers, hs-tier1
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Robin
> 
> Looks good.

Thanks for reviewing! 

> This change will have a (easy to resolve) merge conflict with your fix for 
> JDK-8199736, right?

Indeed, the flag definitions should go on a single line I think. I’ll try to 
get this one in first and rebase 8199736 afterwards.

So, if anyone would be willing to sponsor this change, here’s an updated webrev 
with a proper mercurial changeset (no other changes):
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rwestberg/8199619/webrev.01/ 
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rwestberg/8199619/webrev.01/>

Best regards,
Robin

Reply via email to