Those are all file system call operations,... which will be supported
by whichever C library you are using on you're devices.
>From my reading of the matter libbusybox.so would be more suited to
writing additional utilities that need to directly at an API level
interact with Busybox and its applets.
On 13/09/2007, colin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> Our platform is with low cpu power and an application using "system" api too
> many times will draw down cpu performance.
> These statements are like system("/bin/mkdir ..."), system("/bin/touch
> ..."), ... and system("/bin/rm ...").
> I am thinking if the application is linked with libbusybox.so, we can call
> corresponding functions and then avoid "fork process".
> Is this a good way? The help page says that libbusybox is under experiment
> and I am afraid it's not stable.
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Colin
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> busybox mailing list
> busybox@busybox.net
> http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
>
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
