hmm.. I compiled busybox 1.3.2 and turned on libbusybox option.
After that, the libbusybox.so cannot be found.
Colin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Denys Vlasenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <busybox@busybox.net>
Cc: "colin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 11:44 PM
Subject: Re: Is libbusybox stable for standalone application?
> On Thursday 13 September 2007 08:28, colin wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> > Our platform is with low cpu power and an application using "system" api
too
> > many times will draw down cpu performance.
> > These statements are like system("/bin/mkdir ..."), system("/bin/touch
> > ..."), ... and system("/bin/rm ...").
> > I am thinking if the application is linked with libbusybox.so, we can
call
> > corresponding functions and then avoid "fork process".
> > Is this a good way? The help page says that libbusybox is under
experiment
> > and I am afraid it's not stable.
>
> Current problem is that after build system overhaul libbusybox
> cannot be built ;)
>
> Someone needs to sit down and figure out how to make it work again.
>
> After that, you can certainly use it in a way you described.
> --
> vda
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
