On Thursday 13 September 2007 08:28, colin wrote: > > Hi all, > Our platform is with low cpu power and an application using "system" api too > many times will draw down cpu performance. > These statements are like system("/bin/mkdir ..."), system("/bin/touch > ..."), ... and system("/bin/rm ..."). > I am thinking if the application is linked with libbusybox.so, we can call > corresponding functions and then avoid "fork process". > Is this a good way? The help page says that libbusybox is under experiment > and I am afraid it's not stable.
Current problem is that after build system overhaul libbusybox cannot be built ;) Someone needs to sit down and figure out how to make it work again. After that, you can certainly use it in a way you described. -- vda _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox