On Thursday 13 September 2007 08:28, colin wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> Our platform is with low cpu power and an application using "system" api too
> many times will draw down cpu performance.
> These statements are like system("/bin/mkdir ..."), system("/bin/touch
> ..."), ... and system("/bin/rm ...").
> I am thinking if the application is linked with libbusybox.so, we can call
> corresponding functions and then avoid "fork process".
> Is this a good way? The help page says that libbusybox is under experiment
> and I am afraid it's not stable.
Current problem is that after build system overhaul libbusybox
cannot be built ;)
Someone needs to sit down and figure out how to make it work again.
After that, you can certainly use it in a way you described.
--
vda
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox
