On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 03:28:50PM +0800, colin wrote: > >Hi all, >Our platform is with low cpu power and an application using "system" api too >many times will draw down cpu performance. >These statements are like system("/bin/mkdir ..."), system("/bin/touch >..."), ... and system("/bin/rm ..."). >I am thinking if the application is linked with libbusybox.so, we can call >corresponding functions and then avoid "fork process". >Is this a good way? The help page says that libbusybox is under experiment >and I am afraid it's not stable.
Nowadays i'd link against busybox (built as PIE) and call foo_main(...) etc. The API is not guaranteed to be stable but works fine for me (in practice it doesn't change that much). HTH, Bernhard _______________________________________________ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox