Yeah, I agree one of those platforms would be nice.
However it would be way too easy to submit a invasive and complex patch that
wouldn't get a peer-review. However the PR tracking and other features are
pretty neat.
Personally I am among the anally strict people when it comes to the OS parts.
Git is sure great for a complex project like a kernel but since busybox is a
small and mostly feature complete code base without a regular team of
developers I'd say thai personally am I ambivalent.
//M
Sent from my BlackBerry - the most secure mobile device
Original Message
From: [email protected]
Sent: April 13, 2020 17:04
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: git smart http for busybox repo
busybox should be moved to github or gitlab, that's really smart http
But tracker + git repo + releases + pull requests. As complete as it gets.
No need to send patches through email, even people who don't have git
installed can use the web site to edit files and open pull requests.
It's just too smart.
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
