On 5/27/10 12:21 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: > > On May 26, 2010, at 3:36 PM, Donald Woods wrote: > >> You can find it either in sections 7.1.4 and 7.2 of the >> bean_validation-1_0-final-spec.pdf or from the RI source at - >> http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/hibernate/validator/tags/v4_0_2_GA/hibernate-validator/src/main/xsd/ >> >> which uses ASL 2.0 - >> http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/hibernate/validator/tags/v4_0_2_GA/hibernate-validator/license.txt >> >> The schemas still have not been posted on-line, so we have to include >> them.... >> >> xsi:schemaLocation="http://jboss.org/xml/ns/javax/validation/configuration >> validation-configuration-1.0.xsd" >> >> Not sure why they haven't been included or linked to from Sun/Oracle yet >> - http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/javaee/ > > Thanks. If that's the case, then I see no need for the following in the > NOTICE file: > > "The Bean Validation JSR-303 module (bval-jsr303) includes the Bean Validation > schemas: > validation-configuration-1.0.xsd > validation-mapping-1.0.xsd > from the JSR-303 specification under ASL 2.0. > > JBoss, Home of Professional Open Source > Copyright 2008-2009, Red Hat, Inc. and/or its affiliates, and individual > contributors" > > There's no NOTICE file in their Bean Validation source. Therefore, there's no > requirement for any mention in our NOTICE file. IMO, it should be removed > from the root NOTICE file (and also from > bundle/src/main/appended-resources/META-INF/NOTICE.vm and any other NOTICE > file, where it is mentioned). >
Removed using BVAL-67 and r950324. > A few more questions/comments: > > Where does the file > bval-parent-0.1-incubating/bval-tck/src/main/resources/META-INF/jboss-test-harness.properties > come from? > > bval-json/src/main/appended-resources/META-INF/NOTICE.vm (also bval-jsr303 > and bval-core) contains a copyright for Agimatec. Either that copyright > notice should be added to the root source NOTICE file, or it should be > removed from bval-json. > > I'm not quite certain how I feel about the following in the root NOTICE file: > > "Apache and the Apache feather logo are trademarks of The Apache Software > Foundation." Removed using BVAL-67 and r950324. > > If I understand your motivation, it's because the generated staging site > (http://people.apache.org/~dwoods/bval/0.1-incubating/staging-site/) contains > a built by maven logo with the Apache Feather. You can certainly build a > strong case that the staging site should contain a trademark statement (In > that case, I'd add "maven" to the list of trademarks). I'm not certain, > however, that it's needed in the NOTICE file. I've asked on trademark@ for > some guidance. > > --kevan > >
