Sounds like a good idea, but we need to somehow distinguish between the JSR required constraints and any extras we supply. So, any non-JSR required constraints would not go into the bval-jsr303 module, but should go somewhere else (don't have a good suggestion right now.....)
-Donald On 12/2/10 9:13 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, > I think it could be good and I'd like to propose to add/migrate the > existing commons-validator routines[1] into our constraints[2] > package, what do you think? > Many thanks in advance, > Simo > > [1] > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/validator/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/validator/routines/ > [2] > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/trunk/bval-jsr303/src/main/java/org/apache/bval/constraints/ > > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://www.99soft.org/ >
