Am 08.12.10 21:46, schrieb Simone Tripodi:
Hi all again,
what do you think about:
a) importing the commons-validator and wrapping it in our routines/constraints
OR
b) porting the commons-validator code
I suggest to take in consideration the solution a) even if b)
fascinates me, since bval could become commons-validator2.
But what's your opinion about that?
Many thanks in advance, have a nice day,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
I am not so happy if bval becomes dependent on commons-validator (a).
but I cannot decide if option (b) is feasible.
