Hi Donald, thanks for your feedback, what about adding a new module 'bval-extras' where putting all non-JSR303 constraints? Thanks in advance, have a nice day, Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Donald Woods <[email protected]> wrote: > Sounds like a good idea, but we need to somehow distinguish between the > JSR required constraints and any extras we supply. So, any non-JSR > required constraints would not go into the bval-jsr303 module, but > should go somewhere else (don't have a good suggestion right now.....) > > > -Donald > > > On 12/2/10 9:13 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> Hi all guys, >> I think it could be good and I'd like to propose to add/migrate the >> existing commons-validator routines[1] into our constraints[2] >> package, what do you think? >> Many thanks in advance, >> Simo >> >> [1] >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/validator/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/validator/routines/ >> [2] >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/trunk/bval-jsr303/src/main/java/org/apache/bval/constraints/ >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >
